Can Pepsi and Coke end land grabs for sugar?
The Sirinhaem River twists to the southern Atlantic through the Brazilian state of Pernambuco, breaking into a small delta once lush with mangrove trees where Maria Nazarete dos Santos is no longer allowed to live.
Blame the world's ravenous demand for sugar. Dos Santos is a member of one of more than 50 families that lived on small islands and fished the Sirinhamem for nearly a century until 2002. That's when a militia working for the Trapiche sugar company, owner of a nearby mill and cog that supplies major companies like Coke and Pepsi, swept through their villages, burning their dwellings.
Many of evicted islanders remain homeless. They “got no compensation from the company and live underneath the bridge now”, Dos Santos told the anti-poverty non-profit Oxfam (pdf) last year in a report on land grabs in the sugar industry.
Under pressure from Oxfam, two global behemoths – Coca-Cola and Pepsi – recently issued new policies on land grabs by their suppliers, including Trapiche, that could have global implications.
Read this article in full in The Guardian
- LifeMosaic Resources
- COVID-19 and Indigenous Peoples
- Indigenous Education
- Self Determined Development
- Community Organising
- Women's Rights and Organising
- Land Rights
- Indigenous Languages
- Forests and Climate Change
- Livelihoods and Culture
- Mining and Oil
- Leadership and Governance
- Popular Education
- In Colombia’s Farthest Reaches, These Groups are Battling Covid-19
- From colonialism to COVID-19, Indigenous peoples show resilience in the face of evictions
- Amazonian Indigenous Peoples and COVID-19: ‘We’re not still waiting for help as we know it’ll never arrive’
- How Covid-19 could destroy indigenous communities
- ‘We are facing extermination’: Brazil losing a generation of indigenous leaders to Covid-19